Fleet management consulting: when to call on an external expert?

News

Fleet management today covers an increasingly broad scope: vehicle selection, taxation, total cost of ownership (TCO), energy transition, supplier management, employee mobility, and data management. Companies must make decisions that impact their budget, regulatory compliance, and environmental trajectory.

Engaging a fleet management consultant becomes relevant when a major decision needs to be made, when available data is difficult to analyze, or when internal teams have limited time to conduct a comprehensive assessment. The consultant's services may include optimizing the total cost of ownership (TCO), revising a car policy, electrifying the fleet, preparing for tenders, or planning for upcoming fleet renewals.

WHAT DOES FLEET MANAGEMENT CONSIST OF?

Fleet performance is built over time. Between fleet renewals, regulatory changes, cost control challenges, and the energy transition, companies are regularly required to make significant decisions. Having a clear understanding of their fleet, its usage, and its costs allows them to guide their choices and build a coherent long-term strategy.

A consulting mission may notably cover:

  • auditing the vehicle fleet and its uses;
  • analysis of the TCO and the main cost items;
  • the definition or revision of the car policy;
  • benchmarking of vehicles, contracts and suppliers;
  • purchasing strategy and calls for tenders;
  • car taxation and the carbon trajectory;
  • the electrification of the park and the organization of charging;
  • monitoring indicators and fleet governance.

Consider a company operating 800 vehicles across multiple sites. With 280 contracts nearing renewal, management wants to control costs while continuing its decarbonization strategy. The analysis combines usage data, ownership costs, contract expiration dates, and operational constraints to identify vehicles suitable for electrification and those requiring alternative solutions. Three scenarios are then examined to assess their financial and environmental impacts.

The results highlight several areas for optimization: adapting fleet renewals to actual usage, evolving the energy mix, revising certain benchmark vehicles, and better controlling fleet operating costs. Analyses conducted as part of FATEC's consulting engagements show potential budget optimization of up to 10% of the TCO, depending on the fleet configuration and the levers used. They also enable the development of a CO₂ emissions reduction trajectory of up to 40%, while maintaining alignment with the company's operational needs.

Example of a comparative analysis carried out before a renewal decision

When a company compares several engine options, the lease payment alone is insufficient to measure their true cost. Taxes, energy expenses, benefits in kind, and associated charges can significantly alter the total cost of ownership over the contract term. A comparative study conducted by a Fleet Alternative consultant collaborating with FATEC illustrates these differences.

Compare engine options based on TCO

Rent, energy and taxation: comparing monthly costs reveals the differences between the three engine options.

Comparative position
Electric
Hybrid
rechargeable
Hybrid
Monthly rent749 €638 €572 €
Monthly energy cost102 €210 €237 €
Monthly taxes172 €579 €701 €
Total Monthly TCO1 024 €1 428 €1 511 €
TCO
vs. electric
Reference+28 %+32 %

This illustrative simulation is based on cost assumptions used in a comparative study. Results vary depending on the vehicle, mileage, applicable taxes, and contractual terms.

Source: Internal comparative study carried out on vehicles meeting a similar use in order to assess the impact of different engines on the overall cost of ownership.

In this study, the tax difference reaches up to 75% and the TCO difference exceeds 30% between different engine options. This type of analysis makes it possible to objectively assess renewal decisions, measure the impact of tax changes, and identify the solutions best suited to the company's economic and environmental challenges.

WHEN TO USE A FLEET MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT?

YOU STILL COMPARE VEHICLES MAINLY BASED ON THEIR LEASE RATE

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) encompasses all expenses related to a vehicle: financing, fuel, maintenance, taxes, claims, management fees, and capital expenditures. Focusing solely on the lease payment obscures the variations that emerge over the vehicle's lifespan.

Two vehicles can therefore have a comparable monthly lease payment but different total cost of ownership (TCO). The consultant compares the cost items to determine the source of the discrepancy and prepare a decision: review the vehicle being considered, adjust its allocation, renegotiate a service, or modify the renewal schedule.

A comparable rent can produce a different TCO

Rent represents only a fraction of the actual cost. Significant differences emerge when all direct and indirect expenses are consolidated over 36 months.

Comparative position
Vehicle A
Vehicle A
Vehicle B
Vehicle B
Monthly financial rent
620 € /month
620 € /month
Energy over 36 months
5 400 €
7 800 €
Taxation over 36 months
2 100 €
4 500 €
Maintenance and immobilization for 36 months
3 900 €
6 200 €
TCO over the period
33 720 €
40 820 €
Discrepancy observed
Reference
+ 7 100 € (+21 %)

* Calculation over 36 months (36 rents at €620 = €22,320) including actual energy, tax and maintenance costs.

This economic analysis also serves to compare powertrains. The switch to electric vehicles should therefore be evaluated by comparing the total cost of ownership (TCO) with real-world usage.

YOU NEED TO DETERMINE WHICH VEHICLES CAN ACTUALLY CONVERT TO ELECTRIC

Electrifying a fleet requires cross-referencing mileage, routes, parking times, contractual deadlines, and operational constraints. This analysis allows for classifying vehicles according to their level of electrocompatibility and coordinating their replacement with the deployment of charging stations.

Let's consider the simplified case of a fleet of over 500 vehicles. The study can distinguish between vehicles compatible with immediate conversion, those requiring further analysis, and those whose usage temporarily necessitates a different powertrain. It also identifies the sites where charging should be prioritized.

FROM USE TO ELECTRIFICATION TIMETABLE

The decision is based on four complementary levels of analysis.

Step 01 Analyze the uses Mileage, journeys, business constraints and parking time.
Step 02 Assess compatibility Compatible vehicles, vehicles requiring further investigation, or vehicles temporarily restricted.
Step 03 Sizing the refill Home, site, roaming, available power and downtime.
Step 04 Set the calendar Priorities by site, contractual deadlines and upcoming renewals.

This study can be integrated into a strategy for greening the fleet and theinstallation and management of charging stations.

However, it requires gathering multiple data sources and coordinating different stakeholders. This task becomes more difficult when teams are already devoting most of their time to day-to-day management.

OPERATIONAL EMERGENCIES DELAY KEY DECISIONS

Driver requests, contracts, suppliers, renewals, maintenance, reporting, and taxation take up a significant portion of the teams' time. As a result, progress on substantive issues is slower, even when a tender, a change in car policy, or an electrification strategy needs to be prepared.

An external intervention provides timely analysis and a working methodology. Internal teams retain decision-making power while the consultant structures the data, scenarios, and timeline.

When the need also relates to the sustainable processing of daily operations, this intervention can be complemented by outsourced operational fleet management.

Methodological support, however, depends on the quality of the available information. The first step often involves gathering data from multiple sources.

The park's data is distributed among several tools or service providers

Fleet status, mileage, costs, contracts, taxes, emissions, claims history, actual usage, deadlines, and alerts may come from different files or providers. Consolidating this data allows for comparison of the same indicators over a common scope and a consistent period.

The consultant defines the necessary data, verifies its consistency, and develops indicators tailored to the decisions to be made. The reporting then becomes usable by the relevant departments, with a clearly defined calculation method and update frequency.

Once consolidated, these indicators make it possible to simulate the consequences of fleet growth, significant renewal, or regulatory changes.

A major change to the park needs to be decided

Growth, fleet mergers, massive renewals, new car policies, budgetary pressures, or evolving usage patterns: these situations modify several parameters simultaneously. A decision made on a vehicle-by-vehicle basis does not always allow for measuring their consequences at the fleet level.

The external analysis compares several scenarios, specifying the vehicles involved, the budgetary consequences, the operational constraints, and the implementation schedule. It thus provides a common basis for the purchasing, finance, human resources, and operations departments.

WHAT WILL A FLEET MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT ANALYZE?

The previous situations call for the same first step: establishing a common basis for decision-making. The diagnosis brings together four dimensions that are often studied separately.

THE FOUR KEY AREAS OF FLEET DIAGNOSIS

Each axis provides part of the explanation. Combining them allows us to construct comparable scenarios.

Park Volume, age, engines, contracts, assignments and renewal cycles.
Finance Total cost of ownership (TCO), financing, energy, maintenance, taxation, claims and reimbursements.
Uses Routes, mileage, parking, charging and operational constraints.
Strategy Car policy, carbon trajectory, procurement, governance and monitoring indicators.

The result: scenarios that specify the scope concerned, the budget, the constraints, the schedule and the monitoring indicators.

FROM FRAMEWORK TO ACTION PLAN

A consulting mission typically follows six steps:

  1. define the objectives, scope and decisions to be prepared;
  2. collect and control the available data;
  3. analyze the fleet, costs, contracts and uses;
  4. build multiple scenarios;
  5. to arbitrate with the relevant departments;
  6. formalize an action plan and its monitoring indicators.

The deliverables depend on the scope of the mission: inventory of the fleet, segmentation of uses, analysis of TCO, benchmarking, renewal scenarios, electrification trajectory, car policy recommendations, schedule and dashboard.

WHAT AN EXTERNAL PERSPECTIVE BRINGS TO THE ANALYSIS

The consultant brings an external perspective and a structured analytical methodology to the contracts and practices of the fleet. This position facilitates the comparison of several scenarios without automatically reverting to an existing organization, supplier, or engine.

Her experience with different fleet configurations also provides points of comparison. It helps to identify discrepancies that warrant analysis and to distinguish a situation specific to the company from a more general market trend.

The mission ultimately results in usable deliverables: diagnosis, scenarios, priorities, timeline, responsibilities, and monitoring indicators. The consultant's role is therefore to document the decisions made, not to replace internal decision-makers.

STRUCTURE THE NEXT DECISIONS RELATED TO YOUR FLEET

A consulting mission can take place before a major renewal, a redesign of the car policy, a call for tenders, a change in the financing method or the deployment of electric vehicles.

FATEC's Consulting division analyzes the company's equipment inventory, costs, usage patterns, and constraints. The analysis results in comparable scenarios and an action plan outlining priorities, timelines, and key performance indicators.

Discover more news